"The idea that all exists on one level of reality only is rejected in this model. "

This might express my fundamental departure from the traditional physical view, where I reject non-contextuality. Reality depends on its context, defined by its ambient surroundings(s) (or levels of reality, if you will).

In my preprint, I detail my basic assumptions. From these basic assumptions, I draw on emprical observations and facts to build my model of physical reality.

WYSIWYG incorporates the noncontextual interpretation intact, but adds contextual properties. These define irreversible time (as separate from mechanicl time) and allows definitions of dissipative process and complexity, which are missing from traditional physics.

Beyond your initial statement, I see analogies and conjectures, but no logical connections relating stated initial premises to explanations of empirical facts.

I myself am struggling to gain recognition from the physics establishment, so while I might be sympathetic, I am in no position to help you in that endeavor.